DM Confidential Affiliate Newsletter and Deals
Newsletter and DealsContact USAffiliate TipInternet Marketing ClassifiedsAffiliate Newsletter BackIssuesDMConfidential SubscribeDMConfidential Advertise
Confidential Affiliate Newsletter for the online marketing industry.

Subscribe
Features
Digital Thoughts
Trends
Affiliate Marketing Tips
Partner Marketing
May's Take
DirectTrack Aggregate Index
Privacy Flash
Press Releases
Search Engines
DM Pimping Cartoon
DM University
The Roman Column
Web Trends
Marketing
Public Relations
Spotlight On...
iLegal
SEO
Broken News
PHOTOS
Leaders Series
Affiliate Newsletter
Current Affiliate Newsletter
Affiliate Newsletters
Industry News
Affiliate Deals Blogs
Advertise
Internet Marketing Classifieds 
Subscribe
Contact US 
Topics
Affiliate Marketing
Behavioral Marketing
Blogs
Bmay
Co-Reg
Conferences
Desktop Apps
Display
DM University
Domain Names
Email
Gaming
General Internet
Incentive Marketing
Lead Generation
Legal Compliance
Marketing
Marketing Tips
Merger and Aquisitions
Mobile
Networks
Outsourcing
Press Releases
Privacy
Public Relations
Search
SEO
Social Networks
Tech
Video
Video Games
Viral Marketing
Web
Resources
 
Internet Marketing Resources
RSS
 
Internet Marketing RSS

Advertise with us

 

 


 

 

Marketing
        

Lead Quality: Finding the right mix between quality and volume
by Dave Wengel

How do other lead generation companies pro-actively improve their lead quality while still delivering on the growing volume demands of their clients?”

The aforementioned question is probably the most frequently asked one that I field from potential new clients. Most folks asking the question assume that improved lead quality equals fewer leads being sold. And in many cases, they are correct. But they also assume that improved lead quality will result in reduced revenue. This is where they are misguided. Let me give you an example.

Back in the spring, one of the top online education sites sent out a missive to its legion of lead providers. The email was urging them to improve their lead quality… or else. Two of their lead providers, Vendare Media and High Voltage Interactive, had shown significant improvements in lead quality for this client. The online EDU was hoping that other lead providers would follow suit. In the meantime, Vendare and High Voltage were rewarded with additional business as a result.

My understanding is that a good portion of that business was re-apportioned from other existing lead providers that had failed to meet the EDU’s lead quality guidelines. The other lead providers were fortunate to have at least been given a heads up that a crackdown was coming though. In many cases, lead generators get no such warning. They either flat out lose clients or they never win additional business from their existing clients.

The example above highlights the fact that a short term investment in better lead quality pays off — usually sooner rather than later. At the end of the day, no one buying leads cares who sent them the most leads. They care about knowing who sent them the best performing leads, so they can buy more from that party.

So, all that being said, let’s get back to actually answering the question at hand instead of just dissecting it. Unfortunately, there is no generic state of lead quality nirvana that everyone can fine tune their dials to. Instead, there is a cause and effect relationship whenever a lead generator tries to refine the process of deciding what a quality lead is. No process will ever be perfect — some bad leads will always still get through, and a smaller percentage of good leads may even be incorrectly rejected. Further, no two clients are likely to have the same quality thresholds.

The important thing is that both sides, the lead buyer and the lead seller, set expectations upfront about what constitutes a quality lead and what tradeoffs might be necessary in order to hit a specific cap in a short period of time. If the lead seller can meet and/or exceed these expectations, then they can expect to be rewarded just as Vendare and High Voltage were in the example above.

 
Add to: Digg this Digg  | 

Dave Wengel
General Manager of Interactive Markets
TARGUSinfo
www.targusinfo.com
e: davidwengel@targusinfo.com

Share your Comments
Call me for a competitive quote!

Please visit our web site at www.LeadVerifier.com then call me to get the best service at the right price at 954-428-2270.

Paul Lacey
www.LeadVerifier.com
paul@LeadVerifier.com

Posted by: Paul Lacey   Date: December 07, 2006
URL: http://www.LeadVerifier.com
181128

Attention Paul Lacey- how about paying DM Confidential for a banner ad the next time you want to relentlessly tout your service. preferable over your weekly crazy eddie routine.

Posted by: anonymous   Date: December 07, 2006

181130

I don’t agree that “even then you will get the random person who claims that the user was looking for a "FREE IPOD" If you don’t advertise that way, you won’t produce those leads, period. You will, however, always need some sort of data validation like Targus to weed out potential fax numbers, fake info, disconnects, etc.

I believe that if you start with a quality source, and add on human and automatic data validation, then you have a good lead.

Posted by: Michael Mahoney   Date: December 15, 2006
URL: http://www.prospectzone.com
181205


Share your Comments

Name:
Email:
URL:
Comment

refresh image?
Enter Code

 

 

 

W4 Performance Ad Market

Revenue Street

AxonMediaGroup

Effectus Software

TheBizOppNetwork

eAdvertising


To Advertise in Digital Moses contact editor@digitalmoses.com

 

copyright © Digital Moses
The articles and opinions expressed within are those of industry professionals and do not necessarily represent those of Digital Moses LLC

 

 

Privacy Policy