DM Confidential Affiliate Newsletter and Deals
Newsletter and DealsContact USAffiliate TipInternet Marketing ClassifiedsAffiliate Newsletter BackIssuesDMConfidential SubscribeDMConfidential Advertise
Confidential Affiliate Newsletter for the online marketing industry.

Subscribe
Features
Digital Thoughts
Trends
Affiliate Marketing Tips
Partner Marketing
May's Take
DirectTrack Aggregate Index
Privacy Flash
Press Releases
Search Engines
DM Pimping Cartoon
DM University
The Roman Column
Web Trends
Marketing
Public Relations
Spotlight On...
iLegal
SEO
Broken News
PHOTOS
Leaders Series
Affiliate Newsletter
Current Affiliate Newsletter
Affiliate Newsletters
Industry News
Affiliate Deals Blogs
Advertise
Internet Marketing Classifieds 
Subscribe
Contact US 
Topics
Affiliate Marketing
Behavioral Marketing
Blogs
Bmay
Co-Reg
Conferences
Daily Deals
Desktop Apps
Display
DM University
Domain Names
Email
Fraud
Gaming
General Internet
Incentive Marketing
Lead Generation
Legal Compliance
Marketing
Marketing Tips
Merger and Aquisitions
Mobile
Networks
Outsourcing
Press Releases
Privacy
Public Relations
Search
SEO
Social Networks
Tech
Video
Video Games
Viral Marketing
Web
Resources
 
Internet Marketing Resources
RSS
 
Internet Marketing RSS

Advertise with us

 

 


 

 

Digital Thoughts
        

The Long-Term Survival Checklist
by Editor

Despite all the crap that has happened, we still find ourselves able to not only defend but believe in the value proposition that is the performance marketing space. And, it's quite a laundry list of crap. In some respects, performance marketers have managed to pretty much destroy anything good that has come their way. We have alienated many major traffic sources, especially Google. We've managed to stoke the ire of Attorney Generals, the FTC, the BBB, all the way up to the credit card processors themselves. We tend to overkill almost any segment we touch, pushing as hard as we can until eventually it either breaks or we give up on it. And, we have a lengthy and ongoing track record of pretty much lying to consumers. Yes, if we look at it from that perspective, we suck and deserve all of the negative things said about the industry. On the flip side, though, we are pioneers, risk takers, marketing wizards, masters of our destiny, the envy of those in the rat race, and if not anything else, a group of innovators. What we really are, though, is human. The do what it takes to survive, attack an opportunity hard with reckless abandon, even if it becomes a tragedy of the commons is not something unique to performance marketers. We just elicit those outcomes quicker than in other industries, but they are the same outcomes that we see with the environment and the financial system.

In upcoming pieces, we will talk about replacements for some of the lost continuity business, some of which will fall on the shoulders of the lead generation industry. Already, judging by the ads on Facebook, the lead generation space has started to receive some significant attention from those who in the past looked elsewhere for monetization. As has been a central theme, the difference between lead generation and other forms of customer acquisition are extreme, most notably because the latter involves a billing mechanism and the former simply data. With a billing mechanism in place, there is in many respects a better chance at monetizing the user. After obtaining that piece, you no longer need their involvement. If anything, you need them to become not involved so that the charges will continue to go through. That exact opposite is the case with lead generation offers. Getting a user to complete a form is just the beginning, at least for the end advertiser. For most verticals, they must then follow-up with the lead and convert it to a sale. The difference between someone interested, mildly interested, and not interested is huge. It's equally important to realize that there will be two parties on each lead, the person selling and the person being dialed. Success in lead generation means a lot of things, but it absolutely doesn't happen by passing off data.

Some companies will crash and burn in their lead generation marketing efforts. Others will manage to keep getting greater allocations and continue to enjoy the benefits of these offers. Who falls in which group depends on which can follow the below guidelines. And, they are equally applicable to the continuity space as they are to lead generation. They came out of a recent conversation with a savvy investor who has thus far shied away from many companies in our space.

Do Users Know?
Not to answer a question with a question, but what do users think they are getting? Do you think an ad that reads "Obama Wants You to Get a Degree" and takes users to a landing page that discusses how he set aside money for education will convert well for the end school? No. Users who complete that form do so under the impression that they might miss out on some pool of money that makes it cheaper if not free to go back to school. There's an auto insurance ad running that does something similar, enticing users by saying they can get auto insurance for $13 per month. Through a series of hops, that message is lost by the time a user gets to the landing page, but the user won't forget when talking to someone. In other words, the bait and switch of free iPod marketing is a recipe for disaster and will not work for the long-term. You can get away in the short term sending crap traffic, but the tides are against you if you want to keep that money coming in.

Do Advertisers Know?
As important as it is for an aware user, the advertiser too must know. What would an advertiser think if they saw your ad? Would they approve? What about the landing page? We operate in a world of gray where sometimes the advertisers might reject or find offensive something that actually works very well. They don't always know what works best, but if they would find shocking how others promoted their service, that does not bode well for long-term success. Given that the world is not perfect and far from ideal, you still want to try and get close to the idea which would mean if an advertiser saw how you promoted their service, they wouldn't mind. We can't always expect them to love it, but they shouldn't do worse than cringe.

Good? Just Good Enough? Or, Just Below Good Enough?
Even the most gray of marketers tends to have a gut feel of their efforts. The distinction between white hat and black hat marketers is more often the level of concern, not the level of awareness. Good and bad marketers know when they've done something bad. One side simply holds themselves accountable. Instead of calling it white hat or black hat marketing, another way to view the scenario is to grade one's efforts. Are you doing good work? Are you doing just good enough work? Just good enough work won't win you any awards, but it doesn't yield a net negative. Good work might be that campaign with high margins where just good enough is break even to making some money. The temptation, though, is to engage in just below good enough work and try to convince yourself you're doing just enough to be good. But, a losing campaign is a losing campaign. If we want to make sure our marketing efforts won't get shut down, we need to stay at or above good enough.

Compliance on the checklist above might not make you the most money out of the gate, but it will make you money when others get shut down.
Add to: Digg this Digg  | 

Editor
DM Confidential
www.dmconfidential.com

Share your Comments
Great reminder. Also are you adding value to your customer or client?

I believe is the further away your marketing is to what you are actually selling or providing the more tendency for what you stated above.

It's easy for a marketer sitting behind the screen who never meets, sees, or interacts with leads or consumers to go into bait and switch tactics.

I feel strong lead gen with a strategic back end provider is what has been most successful for what I've accomplished.

Posted by: Scott Scanlon   Date: February 04, 2010
URL: http://www.YouBrandInc.com
241633

Thank you for your honest diagnosis of the issues with performance marketing for both the advertiser and publisher.

Your comment, "You can get away in the short term sending crap traffic, but the tides are against you if you want to keep that money coming in". This is the reason why I had an issue as an advertiser promoting my company through CPA networks - a lot of crap traffic. Partially due to the publisher being creative in promoting a company to increase their conversion rates and short term commissions. Once the advertiser pulls their company because of the crap traffic, the publisher moves on to the next company for the same short term high.

I think the only way to hold everyone accountable, both advertiser and publisher, is a commission plan based on revenue share. That way the publisher is forced to send traffic that results in sales not leads. It also forces the advertiser to have a product that delivers value to the end consumer so that lead converts to a sale. This does put a bit more risk on the publisher but it will in the long term make them more money.

Lastly, visibility into the publishers marketing tactics is critical to a brand conscience advertiser like us. Another reason why I was hesitant to promote our product as a stand alone within the CPA Networks. Where is my ad going to show up, how are you driving traffic and how can I make sure that you are not incentivizing the offer.

Posted by: Brandon Delgrosso   Date: February 04, 2010
URL: http://www.doba.com
241634


Share your Comments

Name:
Email:
URL:
Comment

refresh image?
Enter Code

 

 

 

W4 Performance Ad Market

Cutting Edge Offers


To Advertise in Digital Moses contact editor@digitalmoses.com

 

copyright © Digital Moses
The articles and opinions expressed within are those of industry professionals and do not necessarily represent those of Digital Moses LLC

 

 

Privacy Policy