The Demise of Lead Generation
By Lindsay Mure

So far most of the articles I’ve read give positive projections for our industry in 2005. When asked to write this article, and give my projections for online lead generation in the New Year, I was conflicted. Although I feel this will be a great year, I am fearful that if some online lead-generation business practices continue the way they were in 2004, we may experience an unwanted downturn in our business. My fear was compacted by a DMA teleconference I listened to on Tuesday that detailed FTC regulations and DMA guidelines on lead-generation and direct marketing. The FTC and DMA have started cracking down on these “un-lawful” behaviors, but they have just started to scratch the surface.


https://www.lynxtrack.com/signup.php

Hopefully, by expressing my fears, lead-generation companies will be encouraged to uphold the best business practices that will earn them more business from their clients and contribute to our industry’s growth. In addition, I hope that this encourages advertisers and media buyers to do their part in researching lead-generation companies thoroughly, allowing them to work with the companies that uphold these business practices.

The FTC law that is most relevant to what is happening in online lead-generation today is Section 5 of the FTC Act which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the marketplace: http://www.ftc.gov/privacy/privacyinitiatives/promises.html.

Before I came to work for Permission Data (a reputable online lead-generation company), I spent several years working as a media buyer/marketing manager for online agencies. Due to the nature of agency buying I worked with as many lead-generation companies as possible. This experience taught me how to buy leads from multiple sources for multiple clients. While working for Permission Data I have had the opportunity to learn the inner workings of lead generation, data cleansing and data delivery. All of this experience enforces my belief that ethical and reliable companies should set the standard for best business practices, not those who are just out to make a quick buck. To demonstrate the business practices I am referencing here is a quick Do’s and Don’ts list that lead-generation companies should follow: 

ü       Do not resell registration data to the point where it becomes ineffective and unresponsive for the advertiser who originally purchased the leads.

ü       Do not data dump or sell your clients a mixed bag of real opt-in and bulk data.

ü       Do not pre-populate fields without your client’s approval.

ü       Do not FORCE registrants to opt-in to any offers.

ü       Do not have a “survey process” (pages of offers) that frustrates registrants by taking 15+ minutes to complete, or to not completing at all.

ü       Do not run too many offer pages hosted by other companies. You could be displaying the same offers over and over again. I have seen this a lot lately, and in many instances this will lead to duplicate data and frustrated registrants.

ü       Do not infringe on brand name trademarks – this confuses the registrant as to who the offer is coming from.

ü       Do not make the registrants jump through multiple hoops to claim their prize, gift, discount or enter into a sweepstakes. [This includes, but is NOT limited to: forcing them to follow up via phone, fax or email in a specified time frame; tricking them to sign up for a continuity program without clearly disclosing the terms and conditions; not clearly stating that they have to take multiple CPA offers, etc.]

ü       Do research the companies that are hosting an offer page within your process to make sure they do not force opt-ins, have duplicate offers or run opt-outs.

ü       Do fulfill on the “Freemium” you originally used to get the person to register in the first place.

ü       Do have a good customer service system in place for fulfillment questions and concerns.

 

By continually working to uphold these business practices our client’s will have cleaner, fresher, more responsive data which will ultimately lead to an increase in business. If companies continue to ignore their client’s needs, business will decline and my fears will become reality. How do I know this? A large part of my job is buying leads. Lately, some lead generation companies seem to be scrounging for new advertisers because their long standing clients are dropping off like flies. I can assure you this is due to invalid or non-responsive data. The equation is simple: Bad business practices = loss of clients; maybe not immediately, but eventually.

On the other side of the coin, advertisers and their media buyers need to do their part in researching these companies before working with them. Often, I meet advertisers who have removed lead-generation from their online budget because they received crap data from the first company they bought from. When I inquire about the research that went into finding this company I realize that one or all of these things happened:

  • There was not enough time to thoroughly research multiple companies so they went with the first company they could find.
  • The company made false promises, and the buyer did not research their methods and practices before working with them.
  • OR the buyer did not know what questions to ask in order to understand what data quality, quantity and responsiveness to expect.

Here are some questions all buyers should ask before purchasing leads/data from a lead-generation company or broker:

1.       How many registrations do you receive per month (per site and across all sites if they own multiple web properties)?

2.       What types of offers perform best on your sites?

3.       Can I have a link to all of your registration processes? (Get a link, not a screenshot and go through the entire process).

4.       If my offer was on your site, where would it be in your process? (If you are one of the top spots you will receive more leads than if you are the last offer presented).

5.       How many advertisers do you have on your pages?

6.       What is your site’s demographic breakdown? Can you target based on these demographics?

7.       Do you have a data cleaning process? If so, what does it do?

8.       Do you have client testimonials or references? (try to get 2 – 3)

9.       How many companies manage your list of registration data? (be wary if it is more than 2)

10.   Do you resell any of your registration data to other marketing companies? If so how many? (be wary if it is more than 2)

11.   Do you force registrants to opt in to any offers? (Go through the registration process and double check that they don’t)

12.   What is the “freemium” (sweepstake or free offer) attached to the registration that incentivizes consumers to sign up?

13.   If they are using a brand name in the “freemium” ask: Do you have the brand’s permission to use their name? If not be wary.

14.   Is the registrant required to perform an action in order to partake in the “freemium”? If so what is that action? (Knowing this will help you gauge if the company is fraudulently having consumers sign up with no intention of actually providing the “freemium”).

15.   How many pages within your process are hosted by other companies? What are the names of those companies? (You may already be working with a company that has their page hosted within their process. Therefore you may receive a lot of duplicate data).

So, after all is said and done, my projections for the 2005 are simple: Many companies will succeed and many will fail, but overall our industry will continue to grow. I am excited to see what the future has in store for those of us who uphold the best business practices and I am fearful for the future of those who do not. Good luck to all of you. I look forward to working with you all toward a successful 2005!

 


Lindsay Mure
Director of Marketing and Partner Relations

 

  Also on the Confidential:

Top Offers From Top Networks

Digital Thoughts

Partner Marketing

Trends

.COM 2.0

The Demise of Lead Generation

Mays' Take - Mind Torn Apart By Wins and Losses

Breaking News and Industry Headlines